New software aids blowdown
Controlled
Group, the Yorkshire based Demolition Company, have just successfully trialed,
for the first time in the UK, a new collapse simulation software package from
the US company ASI. And the results were impressive.
On Sunday
22 June former Newcastle and England manager, Sir Bobby Robson, pressed the
button to detonate the explosive charges that brought down the old Newcastle Brown
brewery building.

Designed Collapse Mechanism

Extreme Loading 3D collapse simulation

The dust cloud quickly obscures
the collapse
It took two
days to build the model and then another two days to run the program. Extreme
Loading by ASI calculated the freefall trajectory of each structural element and
the interface forces between adjacent elements, both connected and separated, something
which Finite Element Analysis is just not capable of'.
The 1960s
reinforced concrete brewery structure was 60m square by 40m high. The designed
collapse mechanism focused around the columns in the centre of the building
being destroyed first and then the floor slabs, with their vertical support
gone, sagging like a heavy net and pulling the sides of the building into the centre.
However, this was complicated by the long-span barrel vault roof which provided
the top floor with a virtually column free space. The four vaults were
supported on 2m deep post-tensioned beams each spanning 40m.
Selected internal columns were detonated in a delayed sequence that
forced one end of the roof to hinge at the external face and drop into the
centre of the building footprint. This collapse mechanism was essential to
avoid structural damage to the flats and offices that were built only 10m away
from the Brewery.
'It was reassuring
to see that the results of the simulation were as we expected, but of more
value', says Rob, 'was the fact that the simulation did not produce any
unexpected issues, such as rogue columns falling away from the building and
potentially damaging the neighbours. The barrel vault roof would have been very
difficult to deal with using traditional demolition methods. A lot of temporary
props and ties would be needed to enable conventional demolition.’

Much of the debris pile is in the
6m deep basement
It is
always a tense moment just before the button is pressed, and this was no
different.
After the
dust had cleared the debris spread was seen to be just as predicted by
Controlled and ASI. Studying the videos afterwards showed that the collapse had
worked just as planned although there were some subtle differences. The speed
of the drop was a little faster than expected. This was probably due to the
fact that there were no internal walls left in the building to slow the
collapse. In hindsight possibly Controlled could have charged fewer columns but
that can increase the risk of a stand-up and the important thing is to have the
debris pile as low as practical for processing the material afterwards.
'We will
definitely be using the Extreme Loading software again' says Rob. 'It can
provide a very useful check against collapse mechanism designs, although as
with all design software, the results can only be as accurate as the data
input. We now have more confidence in the Extreme Loading output and that confidence
will grow each time it is used. It is great to be able to show a client and
interested parties what you expect to happen on the day of the blowdown. The
next stage for us will be to use the software to refine the designed collapse
mechanism by tweaking the model and trying out different delays and collapse scenarios.’
Learn
more about Extreme Loading ® for Structures
technology used on the project at www.appliedscienceint.com.
………….End of article.